SWOTPal Stability Score
Tesla Stability Score: 36/100
Q1 2026 (March 2026) · Last updated 2026-05-10
Tesla scores 36/100 on the SWOTPal Stability Score for Q1 2026 (March 2026), ranking 10 of 10 — the lowest score in our coverage set, below NVIDIA (61). The strongest dimension is Solvency at 19/25; the weakest is Valuation at 4/25.
Profitability
7/25Gross margin 16.3%, operating margin 6.0%, ROIC 6.0%. 3-year net margin trend: declining.
- Gross margin16.3% · 0/8
≤ 20% → 0 pts
- Operating margin6.0% · 4/8
5–15% → 4 pts
- ROIC6.0% · 3/5
5–10% → 3 pts
- 3-year net margin trenddeclining · 0/4
declining → 0 pts
Solvency
19/25Debt / equity 0.06, interest coverage 15.00×, current ratio 1.32, FCF / total debt 10.0%.
- Debt / Equity6.0% · 8/8
≤ 0.5 → 8 pts
- Interest coverage15.00 · 6/8
8–15× → 6 pts
- Current ratio1.32 · 3/5
1.0–1.5 → 3 pts
- FCF / Total Debt10.0% · 2/4
5–15% → 2 pts
Volatility
6/255-year beta 2.00, max drawdown 75.0%, 8-quarter EPS CV 0.70.
- 5-year beta2.00 · 2/8
0.2–0.4 or 1.8–2.2 → 2 pts
- 8-quarter EPS CV70.0% · 2/8
0.40–0.80 → 2 pts
- 5-year max drawdown75.0% · 0/5
> 70% → 0 pts
- Revenue growth std dev19.0% · 2/4
10–20% → 2 pts
Valuation
4/25P/E in the 97th percentile of the S&P 500; P/S in the 92th percentile. Lower percentiles score more points (cheaper relative to broad market).
- P/E percentile vs S&P 50097.0% · 0/8
> 90th → 0 pts
- P/S percentile vs S&P 50092.0% · 0/8
> 90th → 0 pts
- EV/EBITDA percentile vs S&P 50097.0% · 0/5
> 90th → 0 pts
- Forward P/E discount35.0% · 4/4
> 10% → 4 pts
Where this score sits in our coverage
All 10 companies SWOTPal currently scores, ranked by total. Highlighted row is the company on this page.
- Google (Alphabet)86
- Microsoft78
- Meta75
- Apple72
- Nike68
- JPMorgan Chase68
- Amazon64
- Bank of America64
- NVIDIA61
- Tesla36
What this score means
What this number means
A SWOTPal Stability Score of 36/100 places Tesla in the stressed (below 60). The score measures financial stability — the company's capacity to absorb shocks across credit and macro cycles — not stock-price upside or competitive moat. Higher = more stable.
Where the score concentrates
Tesla's profile is uneven: Solvency scores 19/25 while Valuation scores only 4/25. Read the dimension cards above for the underlying ratios driving each score.
What the score doesn't capture
The Stability Score is purely quantitative — it doesn't include regulatory action, governance changes, product-execution risk, or geopolitical exposure. For Tesla, those qualitative dimensions are covered in the full SWOT analysis. The numeric score and the SWOT are designed to read together.
Methodology summary
Each dimension contributes 0–25 points. Metric scores are assigned by threshold-based cutpoints applied to public financial data. The score does not capture regulatory, governance, product, or geopolitical risk — only quantifiable financial signal.
Read full methodology →Sources
- Tesla 10-Q Q1 2026 (2026-04-22)
- Yahoo Finance — TSLA (2026-05-10)